000 | 01185 a2200229 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20181203150332.0 | ||
008 | 181129b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
020 | _a9780199288410 | ||
040 | _cIIT Kanpur | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
082 |
_a160 _bB36l |
||
100 | _a Beall, JC | ||
245 |
_aLogical pluralism _cJC Beall and Greg Restall |
||
260 |
_bOxford University Press _aOxford _c2006 |
||
300 | _aviii,143p | ||
520 | _aConsequence is at the heart of logic; an account of consequence, of what follows from what, offers a vital tool in the evaluation of arguments. Since philosophy itself proceeds by way of argument and inference, a clear view of what logical consequence amounts to is of central importance to the whole discipline. In this book JC Beall and Greg Restall present and defend what thay call logical pluralism, the view that there is more than one genuine deductive consequence relation, a position which has profound implications for many linguists as well as for philosophers. We should not search for one true logic, since there are many. | ||
650 | _aLogic | ||
650 | _aCansation | ||
700 | _aBeall, JC | ||
700 | _aRestall, Greg | ||
942 | _cBK | ||
999 |
_c559740 _d559740 |